Friday, February 27, 2009

YES WE CAN..... continue to torture the hell out of the guantanamo kidnap victims.

Madoff - Why does the SEC Legal Counsel cite Executive Privilege over question re Madoff? This ponzi scheme goes very deep. (cia-Int'l bankers)



The $50 to $100 Billion theft is chump change in comparison to what the private federal reserve is doing by swapping Trillions of garbage derivatives with tax payer guarantees in window swaps.

The Police State is quickly ramping up to handle the outrage once the yuppies wake up from their media stupor to find themselves and their nation bankrupt.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Binyam Mohamed - "Confesses" because we're interrogating him by slicing his penis


Now Obama is threatening the British that if they want to make a scene about this it will affect the US-UK intelligence sharing.... right.

Were we drawing pictures on his penis, or were we just scarring for a tattoo? Just how primitive can our military behave with whole hearted public support. My guess is there is no limit. We are just a base as any generation throughout history. We want to see lynchings. We want to see blood.

Obama: Out with the old, In with the New?


I'm going to start a list here of the continuance of the NeoCon dominance of our pseudo government....
  1. Absolutely innocent Guantanamo victims will not get an Obama reprieve.
  2. US military machine will NOT leave IRAQ.... ever.
  3. International Bankers who own the private bank called the Federal Reserve continue to be given unfettered access to pilfer the remaining equity in our American economy without regard for the health of our Dollar or our national debt burden.
  4. The Federal / Military takeover of Police / Sheriff Departments continues to expand at blinding speed.
  5. The alliance of the Int'l Corporations and the US military grows stronger and more dangerous by the day.
  6. Continuation of Extraordinary Rendition and the blanket use of State Secrets Shield defense.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

$66 Trillion - Federal Debt on a GAAP basis

Let's say you make $14,000 per year but you have $66,000 in excess credit card debt at zero percent interest.

You have to pay your normal living expenses so you might be able to pay $150 / month against this debt.

You would be bankrupt.



As a nation we generate $14 trillion, but our government collects around $2.5 trillion of this. We have $66 trillion in accumulated debt.

We cannot seem to pay anything against our accumulated debt.

We are bankrupt.

Jim Rogers - "capitalism has not failed.... " - I disagree.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Adventist Participating in the FEMA population control training program.

http://www.infowars.com/images2/ps/pastor_fema_docs.pdf

Ohio Conference of SDA training in 2006

Over 20,000 pastors have signed up for this confidential training.... you might want to question what your pastor's motivations are these days.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

EU's Toxic Assets is 16.3 TRILLION Pounds.... One can only imagine what American banks are weighed down by...


We are a bankrupt nation.


These derivatives are simply the cascading layers of bets on comparatively small base of receivables. This shared risk is inflated again and again, far above the value of the underlying asset.

The key here is that these wicked international bankers personally made BILLIONS selling these bogus assets around the world. As the pyramid scheme collapses, these bankers have long since used these Billions to buy up real assets leaving the rest of the world looking the fools with guns at each others heads.... and of course these same bankers are more than ready to sell both parties newer and bigger guns.
(this link showed the 16.3 Trillion for about an hour before it was yanked)

Monday, February 9, 2009

Mandarin Hotel in Bejing engulfed in flames... SOMEHOW manages to not collapse... Amazing.... are the Chinese THAT much smarter then us?



9/11's WTC#7 was an obvious implosion and the twin towers an ex-plosion


Still waiting for someone to show me a steel building that just collapses into itself without explosives.... there were 3 on 9/11... no others in the history of steel construction that I am aware of.

Wall Street 2nd Tier fat cats waiting to pounce on the Tax Payer Funded Bailout - This is Capitalism at its finest.



Of course the top tier international bankers have already covered their bad bets from the $9 Trillion dollars directly from the Fed. Now they are using this newly minted funny money to buy up assets while paper still buys gold.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Millville, PA Police Officer Carlo Drogo stops girl from riding on bike, pepper sprays himself.... then punches her 4 times

Another thug cop.... luckily he is being sued and the city of Millville will pay through the nose for hiring this gangster.



Folks these aren't just a few bad cops... this is a national directive.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Eric Alterman's article in the Nation - Censored today by the ADL

Eric Alterman: Cutting Charlie Rangel loose would prove just how serious Obama is about transforming Washington's toxic culture of self-enrichment.
Take, for example, Foxman's recent attack on Bill Moyers (a longstanding friend and occasional supporter of my work). When Moyers broadcast a less than laudatory commentary about Israel's Gaza invasion, Foxman accused the veteran journalist and liberal icon of--I kid you not--"moral equivalency, racism, historical revisionism, and indifference to terrorism." (You can read it online, together with Moyers's response.) The incident says far more about Foxman than Moyers. As M.J. Rosenberg of the Israel Policy Forum observed, Moyers "is one of the most admired figures in America. This attack will harm not at all. It will, in fact, enhance his reputation just as Ed Murrow's was enhanced by the attacks on him during the McCarthy era." Still, it is demonstrative of the maximalist Manichaean mindset that characterizes so much of American Jewish officialdom. Among Moyers's myriad sins, says Foxman, was his "ignorance of the terrorist threat against Israel, claiming that checkpoints, the security fence, and the Gaza operation are tactics of humiliation rather than counter-terrorism." Now really: is it so hard to imagine that the checkpoints, security fence and Gaza operations are tactics of both humiliation and counter-terrorism? Where, exactly, would be the contradiction?

But for the likes of Foxman, any action Israel takes is de facto defensive and solely in the interests of peace, no matter how warlike. He goes so far as to attack Barack Obama's choice of former Senator George Mitchell as the US envoy to the region because--get this--Mitchell is "fair" and "meticulously even-handed," and Foxman says he is "not sure the situation requires that kind of approach." Foxman's moral compass has gotten so twisted, he has the ADL working to undermine Congressional resolutions condemning genocide--specifically, that committed by Turks against the Armenians. Foxman does not dispute that genocide took place; rather, he argues that it would be inconvenient for Turkish (and Israeli) Jews were Congress to take note of it. So we have reached a point where an organization founded by Jews in 1913 to "secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike" is now in the business of defaming those with whom its director disagrees and purposely turning a blind eye to genocide. In light of the desire of so many anti-Semites to treat the Holocaust in a similar fashion, Foxman's position strikes this Jew at least as one too many ironies to be tolerated.

What's more, the defamation of Moyers escalated further. Following Foxman's fusillade, New York Times neocon William Kristol inserted in a regular column--yet another devoted as usual to the majesty of George W. Bush's leadership--an attack on Moyers for allegedly "lambast[ing] Israel for what he called its 'state terrorism,' its 'waging war on an entire population' in Gaza." Like Foxman, Kristol also implied that Moyers was guilty of racism.

Again, read the text of Moyers's remarks. Neither Kristol nor Foxman notes his stated belief that "every nation has the right to defend its people. Israel is no exception, all the more so because Hamas would like to see every Jew in Israel dead," or his deep concern about the growth of "a radical stream of Islam [that] now seeks to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth." Yet despite the fact that Bill Moyers is, well, Bill Moyers, the Times editors not only allowed Kristol to deliberately distort and decontextualize his remarks; they would not allow Moyers to defend himself in his own words in response. After the PBS journalist submitted a letter to the editor, he was told, "We will not print that 'William Kristol distorts or misrepresents,' and the editors will not budge." They insisted that the letter be changed for publication to read, "I take strong exception to William Kristol's characterization," and they truncated much else.

This is pathetic and ridiculous. If one were to survey, say, 1,000 journalists or even 1,000 New York Times readers and ask them whether they were more likely to trust the judgment, honesty or bravery of Bill Moyers or of William Kristol, my guess is that the result would be a landslide victory in Moyers's favor that would dwarf that of Barack Obama's over John McCain. I'd even bet the same would be true in a private survey of Times editors. Yet publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and editorial page editor Andrew Rosenthal--rather than admit their colossal mistake in giving so prestigious and influential a perch to Kristol, who was at long last ushered off the page with his next column just one week later--instead chose to empower his McCarthyite slanders against one of America's most distinguished patriots and practitioners of their profession.

Writing in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz, the celebrated author and patriot David Grossman termed the Gaza operation "just one more way-station on a road paved with fire, violence and hatred," and added, "our conduct here in this region has, for a long time, been flawed, immoral and unwise."

When Foxman and Kristol have the guts to go after Grossman--who, after all, lost his son two years ago in a war both men supported from the comfort of their armchairs--then perhaps we might take seriously their complaints about the relatively moderate sentiments expressed by Moyers. Until then, I fear, we must chalk up their ideological fanaticism and their moral and intellectual confusion as yet another casualty of this endlessly destructive conflict.

Neophyte Congressman didn't get the memo... or the payoff yet.